History & Civics
Gopal Krishna Gokhale, the political mentor of Gandhiji, was one of the most popular Early Nationalist leaders. In this context, answer the following:
(a) State three policies of the imperial regime which were opposed by Gokhale.
(b) What role did he play as a member of Imperial Legislative Council?
(c) How did he try to arouse national awakening?
1ˢᵗ Phase of INM
109 Likes
Answer
(a) Three policies of the imperial regime which were opposed by Gokhale were-
- Incurring huge expenditure on the British army
- Adopting the policy of racial discrimination in appointments to high posts
- Imposing production tax on cotton
(b) Gopal Krishna Gokhale's role as a member of Imperial Legislative Council-
- In 1902 Gokhale became the member of the Imperial Legislative Council. He pleaded in the Council for reduction in Salt Duty and the abolition of excise duty on cotton goods.
- His relentless efforts led to reduction in toll tax.
- He tried to introduce a bill with a view to make primary education compulsory but he could not achieve much success in it.
- Being an economist, he demanded radical changes in the fiscal policy and better jobs for the educated middle class.
- He impressed upon the government to reduce the land revenue.
(c) Gopal Krishna Gokhale tried to arouse national awakening in India in the following ways-
- He criticised the Government on issues such as incurring huge expenditure on the British army, adopting the policy of racial discrimination in appointments to high posts and imposing production tax on cotton.
- During his visit to England he tried to persuade the British statesmen not to give effect to the Partition of Bengal.
- Gokhale set up the Servants of India Society in 1905. The main aim of the Society was to train national leaders who would dedicate themselves to the service of India.
- He impressed upon the government to reduce the land revenue.
Answered By
61 Likes
Related Questions
Read the excerpt given below and answer the questions that follow:
The romance is that there is security of life and property in India; the reality is that there is no such thing. There is security of life and property in one sense or way — i.e., the people are secure from any violence from each other or from Native despots… But from England's own grasp there is no security of property at all and, as a consequence, no security for life. India’s property is not secure. What is secure, and well secure, is that England is perfectly safe and secure, and does so with perfect security, to carry away from India, and to eat up in India, her property at the present rate of 30,0000,000 or 40,000,000 a year, …. I therefore venture to submit that India does not enjoy security of her property and life…. To millions in India life is simply 'half-feeding', or starvation, or famine and disease.
— Dadabhai Naoroji(a) Who was Dadabhai Naoroji? According to Dadabhai Naoroji, in what sense ‘security of life and property’ prevails in India?
(b) How is England ‘perfectly safe and secure’, as described in the excerpt by Naoroji?
(c) Dadabhai Naoroji propounded a theory to describe the exploitative nature of British rule in India. Name it. Explain briefly the last line of the excerpt given above.
(a) Identify the person in the given picture. State three policies of the imperial regime which were opposed by this person.

(b) What role did he play as a member of Imperial Legislative Council?
(c) How did he try to arouse national awakening?
Imagine that you got a chance to interview one of the Early Nationalist leaders. On the basis of interview, express your views on the Early Nationalist leader's beliefs as well as the methods used by him.
Suppose you want to present the demands of the people of your area to the MLA of your area. State which methods followed by the Early Nationalists you would choose and why?